The Phone Can Wait: What Better Sleep Reveals About the Life You're Made For

A simple trick with deeper roots

A recent New York Times wellness piece offers a modest proposal: put the phone down before bed.[^1] The intervention requires only a few minutes of intentional disengagement from screens, and the reported payoff is meaningfully better sleep. The advice is practical, the science is real, and the recommendation is spreading. Yet underneath this quiet, almost obvious suggestion lives a much older and more searching question — one that neither a sleep tracker nor a digital detox checklist can fully answer: Why is stillness so hard for us to choose?

That question is worth sitting with, because the answer shapes not just how we sleep, but how we live.

The body is not a machine to optimize

Sleep science consistently confirms what ancient wisdom already knew: the human body has rhythms. Circadian biology, melatonin suppression from blue light, cortisol dysregulation from late-night stimulation — these findings are real and important. But they point toward something the clinical literature rarely names directly: the body is not an instrument awaiting the right settings. It is a living, integrated whole, designed to rest, and that design is itself a gift.

The Catholic understanding of the person begins here — with the recognition that human beings are made, and that what is made reflects the intelligence and care of its maker. The body's need for sleep is not a limitation to engineer around. It is a built-in invitation toward receptivity. Every night, we are given a small practice in surrender — in releasing the day, releasing control, trusting that the world will continue without our management of it.

When a phone sits glowing on the nightstand, it holds out a counter-invitation: stay alert, stay connected, stay productive. The difficulty of putting it down is less about willpower than about formation. We have been shaped, gradually and mostly unconsciously, to treat wakefulness as virtue and rest as concession.

The virtue the screen quietly undermines

Temperance — the classical virtue concerned with rightly ordering our appetites — is frequently misunderstood as mere restriction. In its fullest sense, it is the freedom to choose well. A temperate person can enjoy a glass of wine without needing the bottle; can engage with news without being consumed by it; can set the phone down, genuinely, because the interior life is ordered enough to tolerate the quiet.

Late-night scrolling tends to erode exactly that capacity. The scroll is engineered for frictionlessness — each swipe returning another pulse of novelty, social feedback, or mild urgency. The cumulative effect, even without dramatic content, is a kind of low-grade hypervigilance that resists the body's invitation to rest. Over time, the nervous system learns to expect stimulation and grows restless in its absence.

Studiousness — one of temperance's overlooked sub-virtues — involves a rightly ordered desire for knowledge: engaged where engagement is fruitful, restrained where it is not. The habit of consuming information until the moment of sleep is, in a real sense, an excess of this appetite. Cultivating the discipline to stop is an act of interior ordering, not deprivation.

Prudence at bedtime

Prudence — the virtue of practical wisdom — is what allows a person to act rightly given real circumstances. It involves foresight: the capacity to trace present choices forward to their likely consequences. A person practicing foresight in the evening asks not "what do I want right now?" but "what kind of morning am I choosing?" and, with a wider lens, "what kind of person am I forming myself to be?"

This is the quietly countercultural move that the Times sleep challenge invites — a small act of foresight wrapped in a wellness recommendation. When behavioral science and classical virtue point toward the same practice, the agreement is instructive. The insight arrives from different directions, but the destination is the same: deliberate restraint in the evening creates conditions for genuine rest.

Circumspection — prudence's attention to context — adds another layer. The bedroom is a particular kind of place. Its purpose shapes what belongs there. Treating it as an extension of the office, the news desk, or the social feed is a subtle confusion of contexts, one that carries real costs.

Stillness as a spiritual competency

The Christian tradition has always held that silence and stillness are not empty — they are full. The contemplative inheritance of the Church, from the Desert Fathers to the Carmelite mystics, insists that the capacity to be quiet before God is something that must be cultivated. It does not arrive automatically. It must be practiced, in small ways, until it becomes a posture of the soul.

The pre-sleep phone habit works directly against this formation. A person who cannot tolerate ten minutes of quiet before sleeping will find extended interior silence very difficult to sustain. The small habit, repeated nightly, is also a small formation — in one direction or the other.

Hope, in the theological tradition, involves a confident trust that what matters will be cared for — that the future is held by something greater than our vigilance. Putting the phone down at night is, in miniature, an act of hope. It is a practice of releasing what we cannot control and trusting that release. Augustine's restlessness before God — his observation that the human heart finds no rest until it rests in its maker — describes precisely what the glowing screen exploits and what deliberate stillness begins to heal.[^2]

Practical steps worth taking

For readers who want to move from insight to action, a few concrete anchors:

Create a transition ritual. A short, repeatable sequence — charging the phone in another room, reading a physical book for ten minutes, or simply sitting in quiet — signals to the nervous system that the day is genuinely ending. The predictability matters as much as the content.

Name what the scroll is substituting for. Often, late-night phone use is less about curiosity and more about avoiding the thoughts that surface in stillness. Those thoughts, however uncomfortable, are frequently the ones most worth attending to.

Begin with one night. The Times challenge suggests that even a single evening of digital disengagement shows measurable effects on sleep quality. One intentional night is a beginning, and beginnings have their own momentum.

Recover the bedroom as a place of rest. Environmental cues shape behavior powerfully. When the space associated with sleep becomes also the space for news, entertainment, and social connection, the body's cue to rest is diluted.

Better sleep is a worthy goal. The path toward it, taken seriously, leads somewhere larger — toward an integrated human life, rightly ordered, genuinely free.

References

[^1]: "Try This Trick for Better Sleep," The New York Times, June 11, 2026, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/06/11/well/summer-challenge-phone-digital-detox-sleep.html.

[^2]: Augustine of Hippo, The Confessions, trans. F.J. Sheed (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1993), Book I, ch. 1.