What Seth Rogen Got Right About Marriage (And What We Can Learn From It)

Seth Rogen — comedian, writer, producer, and now something of an accidental marriage philosopher — recently sat down with The New York Times Magazine to reflect on three decades of navigating Hollywood and a long, stable marriage.[^1] In an industry legendarily hostile to lasting relationships, Rogen speaks with unusual candor about what has kept his partnership with Lauren Miller strong: deliberate attention, genuine friendship, and a willingness to keep choosing each other.

The friendship at the heart of marriage

Rogen describes his marriage less as a romantic achievement and more as an ongoing friendship — a dynamic partnership sustained by mutual respect and real enjoyment of each other's company. Aristotle called this philia, the friendship of virtue, and considered it the highest form of human bond. When two people are united by genuine goodwill toward each other rather than merely by convenience or pleasure, the relationship carries its own internal momentum.

Vitz, Nordling, and Titus ground this in a stronger anthropological claim: the human person is constitutively relational, not an isolated individual who occasionally bumps into others.[^2] We come fully alive in relationship. Rogen's instinct that friendship is the substrate of a good marriage reflects this truth at the experiential level, even if he would not frame it theologically.

John Gottman's decades of research support the same conclusion: couples who maintain a high ratio of positive interactions, who know each other deeply, and who express genuine fondness are the ones who endure.[^3] The empirical data and the philosophical tradition are pointing at the same thing.

Choosing daily, not just once

One of Rogen's more striking observations is that a good marriage requires continuous, conscious choice. The wedding ceremony is a beginning, not a conclusion. This cuts against a cultural tendency to treat romantic love as something that either exists spontaneously or doesn't — as though commitment were a feeling to be discovered rather than a practice to be cultivated.

The Catholic understanding of marriage as a sacrament and a vow deepens this. A vow is a sacred promise that creates its own moral gravity. It is something you lean into on the days when feelings are flat and circumstances are hard. The act of recommitting — daily, in small ways — is itself formative. Aquinas understood virtue as built through repeated acts: you become more loving by practicing love, not by waiting to feel it.[^4]

This is encouraging rather than burdensome. The daily choice Rogen describes is the lived reality of what theologians call agape — a self-giving love oriented toward the genuine good of the other, sustainable precisely because it is rooted in will and character rather than sentiment alone. Karol Wojtyła pressed the same point in Love and Responsibility: love as act of will does not diminish love as feeling; it is what keeps feeling alive across time.[^5]

Wealth, success, and the risk of accumulation

Rogen also speaks with unusual frankness about wealth in Hollywood. He acknowledges that financial success creates its own distortions — that abundance, mismanaged, can hollow out a person rather than fill them. There is a particular danger, he suggests, in mistaking accumulation for meaning.

This is a very old warning. The Gospels return to it repeatedly, not because wealth is evil, but because it carries a gravitational pull toward self-sufficiency that can slowly crowd out the openness and dependence that deeper relationships — and a life of faith — require. Temperance, the virtue of ordered desire, is precisely the capacity to receive good things without being mastered by them. Aquinas locates temperance in the concupiscible appetite: it does not suppress desire but orders it toward genuinely human goods.[^4]

Rogen's own account suggests he has found a version of this equilibrium, partly through his marriage and partly through the discipline of creative work. He uses his resources rather than being used by them.

Vocation and the meaning of the work itself

Three decades into a career, Rogen reflects on what has actually given his work meaning. It is not the fame or the revenue — it is the craft, the collaboration, and the sense that what he makes resonates with real people in real moments of their lives. Robert McKee, writing on the practice of storytelling, observes that the writer who researches deeply discovers that personal experience, far from being idiosyncratic, is universal: 'you'll write in a singular way, but audiences everywhere will understand because the patterns of family are ubiquitous.'[^6] Rogen has spent three decades learning the same lesson through practice.

This is a description of work understood as vocation: not merely a livelihood, but a form of service and self-expression that participates in something larger than individual gain.

Four grounded practices

For anyone navigating their own marriage, relationships, or career, Rogen's interview — read through this lens — suggests four grounded practices.

Invest in the friendship. Romantic love that loses its foundation in genuine liking becomes fragile. Schedule time with your spouse that is about enjoyment, curiosity, and levity — not logistics.

Make the daily choice visible. Small, deliberate acts of recommitment — a kind word, a chosen presence, a sacrifice of convenience — accumulate into character over time. They are the substance of fidelity, not its ornament.

Hold success with open hands. Whatever abundance you carry — financial, professional, social — practice asking what it is for. Gratitude and generosity are the habits that keep prosperity from becoming a prison.

Find the meaning in the work itself. A career sustained by external validation alone is exhausting. Reconnect regularly with why the work matters — who it serves, what it builds, what it expresses.

Seth Rogen did not set out to write a Catholic treatise on marriage and virtue. But at fifty-three, he has arrived at some of the same conclusions that centuries of wisdom tradition have commended. That convergence is worth living.

References

[^1]: Seth Rogen, interview, The New York Times Magazine, June 13, 2026, https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/13/magazine/seth-rogen-interview.html. [^2]: Paul Vitz, William Nordling, and Craig Steven Titus, A Catholic Christian Meta-Model of the Person (2020), ch. 4. [^3]: John Gottman, The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work (1999). [^4]: Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae I-II, qq. 49-67 (habits and virtue); II-II, q. 141 (temperance). [^5]: Karol Wojtyła, Love and Responsibility (1960), pt. II. [^6]: Robert McKee, Story: Substance, Structure, Style and the Principles of Screenwriting (1997).